D.Gakis: «S.Tsiodras revealed that they were hiding at least 60 deaths immediately after vaccination!»

The «Tsiodra study» deconstructed with a post on social media, the doctor and former governor of AHEPA, Dimitris Gakis.

D.Gakis stresses that, with this study, Sotiris Tsiodras revealed that «hid at least 60 deaths immediately after vaccination! These cannot be due to the virus, because it takes some time for death to occur.».

Also, D.Gakis refers to the lies that the «experts» have been telling for so long, as it has now been revealed that the number of vaccinated patients in ICUs is much higher than reported.

The post of D.Gakis

«WHAT HAS BEEN DISCOVERED FROM THE EFFECTIVENESS STUDY OF THE EMBOLE PRESENTED BY MR TSIODRAS - 1

The revelations that Mr. Tsiodras unwittingly (or perhaps deliberately) made were very useful.

Revelations, exposing those who said that the vaccine is 95% effective in disease transmission, and when the place was buzzing about its dramatic drop to 19% (Israel), they changed the tune: the vaccine protects from hospital admission, from ICU admission, from DEATH.

There are no admissions of vaccinated people to ICUs, we were told, in chorus, by politicians and «braggarts». They changed it after a while that only 1% of ICU inpatients are vaccinated. Only infinitesimal deaths in vaccinated inpatients, we were told

LIES, LIES, LIES, LIES upon LIES...

Lies that have created insecurity among citizens and led to a drop in vaccinations for people who need them.

SO SEE THIS FOOTAGE FROM THE «TSIODRA STUDY»

I say at the outset that the «study» has many vulnerabilities. You will understand this in my next few posts, for yourself.

But it is also very revealing!

In a total of 9980 deaths from the 5th-40th week of the year, in the analysis we had 8572 (86%) deaths in unvaccinated, 607 deaths in incompletely vaccinated (6%) and 701 in fully vaccinated (8%)...

Nah nah nah nah! So there are deaths among the vaccinated too, Mr. Prime Minister of the announcements! So 14% of the deaths, according to Mr. Tsiodra, occurred in vaccinated people!

Is it really just them? Let's look at the statistics.

In vaccine efficacy studies, we take two similar groups (vaccinated - unvaccinated) for a certain period of time and study the end point, whether it is disease, hospital admission, ICU admission or death.

In population studies , in real time, where effectiveness is studied, the basic principles of similarity of the two groups, similar time of exposure to risk, same population must be ensured.

In the Tsiodra study, I regret to say that these principles were NOT FOLLOWED. Therefore the credibility of the study suffers. See why.

At the top of the attached third slide (of deaths 25-49 e) there is a rectangle with red (unvaccinated), green (one dose), blue (two doses). The area of these colour areas corresponds to the population at risk of death exposure of each group.

You can easily see how the area of the vaccinated differs from the unvaccinated. In fact, calculating the area of the vaccinated (two groups together) is about 30% of the area of the unvaccinated, numerically.

And the exposure time for the unvaccinated is 35 weeks (5th-40th) while for the two groups of vaccinated under 50 it is 24 weeks (16th-40th) on the chart. But in essence, the standard is taken as, after the vaccination, what happens two weeks after the second dose when they have full immunity, so they probably used 18 weeks (24-6e) as the exposure time.

Therefore they compared deaths in the unvaccinated to 3.3 times the population (hence 3.3 times more deaths) and twice the duration of exposure at risk 35 vs 18 weeks!!!! So 6.6 times greater!

Practically, if this were true for all the vaccinated, the deaths to be compared to the unvaccinated would be 8572 /6.6 = 1298! While the deaths of the vaccinated (1 and 2 doses) were 1308 ! If we consider only 1/3.3 or 8572 / 3.3 = 2597 . Unfortunately, however, he did not give us the numbers of this age group to calculate accurately.

And the revealing. See how the green line rises steeply to 1 death / 100,000 at the start of the vaccine, in the 16th week, which means 1 death / 100,000 vaccinated persons, i.e. in the total of those vaccinated with one dose about 60 deaths immediately post-vaccination (in total first installments of more than 6,000,000 as of 11/10/2021 when the study was done). Otherwise the green line would have a slight slope to the right or micro gradient.

DILADES DILADES Mr. Tsiodras that they were hiding at least 60 deaths immediately after vaccination! These cannot be due to the virus because it takes some time for death to occur.

Finally, the blue line of those fully vaccinated in this age group should have started with the green line, since this vaccination started after 15 weeks, if I remember correctly (preceded by the older ages) and not from 5 weeks.

I will continue the analysis of the «study» of Tsiodra in my next post.

P.S. 1.My calculations , are necessarily rough because I don't have the numerical data and are based on his slides. That is why I ask to give me access to them».